Greetings everyone,
I am writing from an artist's studio located in Berlin, Germany (Studio Olafur Eliasson) and am thrilled to have just stumbled across SIC. As an artist's studio that is deeply committed to reducing our carbon footprint and combating climate change, we are constantly seeking out sustainable solutions in the production and shipping of artworks. As the resident conservator in the studio, I am of course additionally concerned about the characteristics of the materials we are using and whether they are suitable for the delicate artworks we produce.
At the moment, we are looking to overhaul the synthetic packing materials we use in the Studio (PUR/PE foams, Tyvek, etc.) in exchange for natural/sustainable options and I would be very interested if anyone has any information on alternative packing materials and their viability in transporting/storing artworks, (i.e. resistance to microorganisms, out-gassing, acidifying, aging characteristics, etc.) or whether simply recycling the synthetic materials we already use is enough of a step in the right direction? I am looking into a PE foam recycling program with Sealed Air and was wondering if anyone has any experience with them. They recycle used non cross-linked, closed cell PE foam into new non cross-linked, closed cell PE foam, but I question whether transporting the foam in a truck across Germany plus the recycling process are actually “sustainable.” I've come across a few alternatives to our synthetic packing materials, but have not been able to find related research in the field of conservation and am unsure whether these products, such as paper filled "pillows" or natural felt/cork (which eventually release sulfur/acids) can withstand our specific demands in the shipment and storage of artworks. Any leads or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Because we also discard hundreds of disposable gloves (mostly latex) every month, I started looking into disposable glove recycling programs, such as the Kimberly Clark program. Unfortunately Kimtech gloves aren’t ideal for our needs, so I am interested in finding a latex recycling program in Europe if anyone knows of anything.
I’ll post updates on our discoveries in the Studio, as we are often testing alternative materials, and hoping this discourse can move us all towards sustainability in conservation, art production, shipping, storage, and beyond.
Kind regards,
Kimberly
Hi Kimberly,
thank you for your interesting post. Unfortunately, sustainable solutions in the production and shipping of artworks is not a well-discovered field. The packaging industry has made progress towards sustainable and innovative packaging materials but even though plastic packaging is getting more and more competition some of the concepts are still questionable. I suggest taking 3 points into consideration when you want to pick a sustainable packing and storage material.
- Resource consumption of the upstream chains and the manufacturing process (energy, water, resources, environmental consumption). As you mentioned, also take in to account where this product was produced or where the materials are coming from and what energy is needed to bring it to your local dealer.
- Reuse: Are you able to recycling or reuse the product? How long is the live span of the product? How does the waste disposal work after the live span?
- Conservation: Make sure the products don’t emit volatile organic compounds that interact with the material surfaces. Also, take into consideration that even though some materials are sustainable they can constitute another risk. (keyword: pest or microbiological infestation) Carrying out Oddy Test and working on a good airflow and low Temperatures and RH levels in your collection environment can help to minimize the mentioned risks though.
I hope my thoughts helped a little and I really much looking forward to the updates on your discoveries!
Best wishes,
Gina
P.S the following article might be interesting for you: Kracht, Kerstin. 2017. Diese Kiste rettet vierzig Bäumen das Leben. Restauro (Munich) (7): 24-27.
Dear Gina,
Thank you for your thoughtful response as well as the informative article.
I’ve been grappling with the issues surrounding sustainable materials in the context of art transport for the past few months and have come to a few conclusions. Sustainability in the sense of using biodegradable or natural materials in lieu of synthetic materials is not compatible with the criteria we have as conservators, as they deteriorate too rapidly and are often acidic and/or produce VOCs.
As you’ve already noted, I’ve also come to the conclusion that the best course of action at the moment is to assess the manufacturing processes, sources of the materials, recyclability, and general impact of the synthetic materials already in use.
While not entirely sustainable, we are attempting to reduce the amount of synthetic materials we use in packing as well as using recycled / recyclable synthetic materials. Ethafoam offers a PE foam (Ethafoam 220) manufactured with up to 65% recycled PE. I’ve also found polyester batting (needle punched and without binder) manufactured with up 80% recycled polyester. The only issue with these recycled materials is that their the polymer chains are shorter than their newly produced counterparts, which means that they will start to deteriorate a bit sooner, but for transport and short-term storage, they are more than acceptable.
We are still seeking a solution for the amount of discarded gloves we produce in the studio. As I mentioned in another post, the Kimtech recycling program is geared towards medical/pharmaceutical fields and requires an annual volume of 20,000 gloves to partake in the program, which means we are ineligible. In the meantime, we are trying to use washable nitrile coated nylon gloves when applicable, and latex finger cots when only the fingertips require protection.
I will keep everyone posted on any other developments and look forward to continuing this discourse.
Best,
Kim
Hi Kimberly, I work with a consulting company that specializes in sustainable packaging materials. While some of the options may not be specifically developed for artwork and the heritage field, it's possible that there might be some options out there for you. Why don't you send me an email at my company address: sarah.braun@sustainedgemarketing.com, and I can introduce you to my point-of-contact directly to see how we might be able to help!
We're working with a company at the moment that produces Expanded PLA that functions more or less identical to polystyrene packaging but is industrially compostable. Essentially, it's sytrofoam made from corn or sugar cane starch.
I hope that helps!! We also have a contact with a company that is in the process of developing viable packaging materials made from PHA (bacterium synthesized from renewable feedstocks like soy, canola, and palm), which should be extremely useful in the near future. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you!
Thank you for your response, Sarah!
I am familiar with packing foams made from various starches and while I hope these nascent developments in sustainable packing materials can be implemented on a large scale in other sectors, I'm afraid they are not suitable for the transport of artworks or cultural heritage for the reason that they not only lack the impact resistance necessary for the safe transport of objects, but are also incredibly hydrophilic and can deteriorate rapidly if exposed to prolonged humidity.
Hopefully, there will be improvements in the near future, as you mentioned, but I don't think we are quite there yet.
Hi,
I'm posting here purely to express my interest in any developments. We primarily use plastazote LD foam and I have had exactly the same concern at the waste generation from scrap.
I was in contact with Sealed Air about some alternative products and possible recycling programs but unfortunately the rep stopped replying to emails and I haven't had the opportunity to follow up.
In regards to Nitrile gloves - there is at least one brand of biodegradeable gloves
https://www.biogone.com.au/product/landfill-biodegradable-disposable-gloves/ .
I have used these but find them a little too easily torn. We also recycle our non degradeable gloves via Terra Cycle and I have had some preliminary discussion with them in regard to setting up a PE foam recycling stream. I have not been able to follow up with them on this yet. The gloves are recycled in partnership with the postal system here in Australia so I don't know if it will also be available where you are but there is no minimum glove quantity required.
I hope that may be of some help and I look forward to developments in this area.
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for the biodegradable Nitrile glove link. I became aware of this company recently and reached out a month or so ago to receive this reply: "Unfortunately we are not able to supply you with the Showa products in your country, because our licence agreement is limited to the sale of Showa products only in the UK, Ireland and the Middle East."
Hopefully we'll have similar gloves available in Europe in the near future. If anyone comes across a similar product, please share!
I have also been in contact with Sealed Air and recently telephoned with a sales representative here in Germany to inquire about their new "environmentally friendly" foams on the market, as well as the recycling program. In addition to the PE foams made from up to 100% recycled PE, they are now offering "EcoPure PE," which they purport as bio-based, but the only difference between EcoPure and standard Ethafoam is that the ethanol used in its production is derived from sugar cane instead of petroleum. A bit of green washing here, in my opinion, but they they also apparently offer an EcoPure PE with up to 50% recycled PE, which seems like an optimal combination if the use of PE foam is unavoidable.
Regarding their recycling program, Sealed Air is obligated to take back all PE foam scraps from their customers for recycling, but the issue we are having in Berlin is that we'd have to collect enough PE scraps to fill a lorry and then transport the scraps 5 hours away to the Sealed Air manufacturing plant, which is not a viable option. We also don't have PE recycling in general in Berlin, so this is an issue that needs to be resolved by legislative change.
Ok, I'll keep everyone posted on any new developments I come across in my research!
Is it possible you can collaborate with a few larger local museums to get larger quantities and share transport costs? Museum fur naturkunde comes to mind but I know there’s a few more.
Oh for sure! It definitely crossed our minds to link up with distribution companies in the area who already send PE foam scraps back to Sealed Air...still working on this. The issue is also finding storage for 82 cubic meters of PE foam. Renting a container seems excessive. It would be ideal if these companies provided drop off centers!
I sympathise and hope these problems become solutions soon.
The other company I mentioned is TerraCycle who recycle nitrile gloves. They do include Germany in their list of countries that can access their services. They also have the potential to set up new recycling programs if the demand is sufficient.
https://www.terracycle.com/de-DE
UPDATE – Our Sealed Air sales representative came to the studio last week to meet in person and clarify a few things, which means I have new information concerning PE foam to share with everyone.
1. Only 25% of the ethanol used in the “EcoPure" foam production is derived from sugar cane and because the sugar cane predominantly comes from Brazil, it also has a questionable footprint. The hybrid EcoPure has up to 75% recycled content.
2. Sealed Air offers a “maximum recycled content - MRC” Ethafoam that is made from up to 100% recycled content, but it isn’t readily available on the market and can only be produced in large quantities upon request, meaning we are not even able to order it. They also offer a “high recycled content -HRC” Ethafoam with up to 65% recycled content, but it ALSO isn’t readily available on the market, because the demand for it (at least in Europe) is so low. We have decided to start requesting the HRC Ethafoam from our foam distributors and will also encourage our production partners, galleries, etc. to do so as well to create more demand for the product.
3. Just an added note that I think is important to impress: uncross-linked LDPE (low density polyethylene) foam is 100% recyclable. Cross-linked PE foams like Plastazote and Evatote are NOT recyclable. As an alternative to the cross-linked PE foams, which are often chosen because of their smooth, non-abrasive surface, the Sealed Air rep recommended Ethafoam Synergy Prime, which is uncross-linked LDPE. Whether or not LDPE is actually recycled depends on the recycling policy in one’s community. In Berlin, our PE is collected with other synthetic materials and incinerated, even though it can potentially be shredded and then melted back into granulate to produce new foam. These facilities that turn PE foam back into granulate are located in the south of Germany and shipping foam scraps to one of these facilities is essentially like shipping air, which is impractical because the granulate yield is so low and the transport consumes resources. We would need a PE granulate machine in the area to truly implement PE foam recycling.
Hi Kimberly - I have been looking into sustainable packaging materials to be used in conservation and in particular ones linked to the circular economy - this means that they may not necessarily made of sustainable material - but the packaging can be reused multiple times and stay in the system for much longer than we are using at present. Having worked in a number of museums one of the key factors of lack of sustainability is how quickly good quality materials are being thrown away (their life cycle is very short). There is a company in the UK called Rok-Box (https://rok-box.com) - they are now being used by Gander & White ( a big international shipping company. This company makes crates that can be used multiple times with different size objects.
I have also been looking into 3-Dimensional packaging which is a little more complex - it is not easy to replace Plastazote that can be cut so easily to fit snuggly around objects- to fit in boxes, then crates. I think for this we need to think of multiple layering that can fit together and be taken apart, and much more research needs to be spent on understanding how coatings can be removed from surfaces sustainably, for both health and the environment.
Mycelium packaging by Ecovative Designs could be one layer in the solution - strong cheap, deep layered packaging that can either be grown or cut to shape. It is VOC free, dimensionally stable, flame retardant and thermally stable, it is a natural desiccator (it draws water into the structure therefore away from the object). My concern is that it will grow other organisms or pull corrosive materials into its structure and create a reaction. I think you can get round this by layering - in particular painting another coating where the object is touching the material, that is green, inert, free of VOC's, hydrophobic etc. I feel that finding a coating is not so difficult, but finding something to successfully remove it is more tricky so that the packaging can then freely decompose once it has finished its lifecycle. This most importantly needs to be odd tested..
Is anyone interested in helping me/ by spending some time researching this area to see if some of the materials would be suitable?
Hi Melissa,
Thank you for your response! I had the pleasure of attending a Cradle to Cradle (https://epea.com/en/about-us/cradle-to-cradle) conference in Berlin a few months ago and am also interested in implementing concepts of circular economy into art transport. I am familiar with Rok-Box..they reached out to us a while back and while it definitely has wonderful potential in transporting framed works to and from museums, where the works are removed from their crates for exhibition or placed into a storage depot, I’m not sure it would work for us as an artist studio because of the size limitation of the offered crates.
Artworks from Olafur’s studio, which often comprise intricate sculptural components, are packed to specification by our team and then shipped via our galleries to private collectors and institutions worldwide. The transport crates correspond to each particular artwork and although we strongly advise the recipients not to discard the transport crates and accompanying packing materials, it is unfortunately often the case.
In light of this reality, one of our solutions in the studio has been to construct transport crates that can be completely disassembled, not only for easier storage (many collectors and smaller institutions discard transport crates because of a lack of storage space), but the also for the increased reuse/recyclability potential of the packing materials. If the collector or institution decides to dispose of the crate, I wanted to ensure that all of the packing materials are either theoretically recyclable (although this depends heavily on location) or can be sent back to the studio for reuse (metal springs, rubber shock absorbers, etc.). Our next step is to include an informational card attached to the inside of our crates with instructions for disassembly/reassembly, as well as listing the packing materials for that particular crate and in what ways the materials can best be reused and/or recycled.
If the crate is stored for future use, then it is imperative that these same packing materials are relatively archival and resistant to degradation, which is why I’ve also been hesitant to use any material that is hydroscopic or susceptible to microbiological attack, such as mycelium or cornstarch. I am, however, completely enchanted by your idea of coating the mycelium! I’ve been in touch with Krown.bio (https://www.grown.bio/product/giy-kit/) out of the Netherlands, which is a subsidiary of Ecovative Design, and could order a small grow kit for testing. Considering the quantity of works that are packed in the studio, I question how feasible growing a large amount of mycelium would be in regard to expenses and time expenditure, but I am definitely interested in jumping on board with the coating and oddy tests!
Thank you for your response - yes I know cradle to cradle (great book!) I have also followed their course and look to their website for materials, which is a great resource. I am sorry I could not go to the conference.
Packing Olafur's work must be tricky - I know from the Tate show how varied it is. Yes I can imagine growing lots of packaging would be tricky. It could still be modular similar to thick layers of plastazote or foam.
Instructions sheets for disassembly/reassembly of crates and packaging is a good idea, something we had the the V&A.
I bought a sample myself from evocative and grew a shape - The material is in fact very strong and I think in a good environment not grow anything. I have seen table etc being made out of it. I imagine to break down again it would need quite a lot of water - like a cardboard box. I look forward to seeing your experiments.
The coating would also depend on the object that would be housed - maybe something like flock - maybe able to adapt flock to use something more recyclable. I remember sharing a studio with a milliner who made hats that were flocked. You coated the surface you wanted to flock and then had a type of gun that fired flock at the surface.
Coatings always have to be removed mostly using solvents (most likely a non polar solvents). There is an interesting solvent from 'SOLVAY' (a circular company) called Rhodiasolv Iris - it is 80-90% recyclable, i.e. can be used again https://www.solvay.com/en/brands/rhodiasolv-iris. It might be worth asking them which coating does it most successfully remove and work backwards.
Initial thoughts